PJM June Congestion Report

Transmission congestion across PJM remained elevated in June, resulting in $777.8 million in congestion costs. While down from the exceptional $1.0 billion recorded during May's heatwave, congestion continued to affect major transmission corridors across Pennsylvania, Maryland, Northern Virginia and New Jersey.

Tuuli Jevstignejev
Tuuli Jevstignejev
PJM June Congestion Report

Gridraven's Dynamic Line Rating (DLR) analysis identified an average 13.0% increase in available transmission capacity, representing an estimated $88.3 million in potential congestion savings. The consistency of these findings across different market conditions suggests that significant transmission capacity remains available on existing infrastructure throughout the summer.

The Graceton–Manor 230 kV corridor was June's most expensive transmission constraint, generating $51.6 M million in congestion costs. Gridraven estimates that DLR could have reduced those costs by approximately $35.6 million.

Find the full report here.

Key Findings

1. Congestion remains widespread

Congestion affected numerous transmission corridors across PJM, with hotspots concentrated in:

  • Pennsylvania
  • Maryland
  • Northern Virginia
  • New Jersey

Many monitored constraints experienced recurring daily congestion events rather than isolated incidents.

2. Most Expensive Congested Lines

  • Graceton–Manor 230 kV congestion cost $51.6M
  • Ashburn–Goose Creek 230 kV congestion cost $36.7M
  • Everett–Strasburg 115 kV congestion cost $5.9M
  • Conaston–Pea 500 kV congestion cost $2.3M
  • Farmersville–Ridley 115 kV congestion cost $1.3M

The Graceton–Manor 230 kV interface remained the single largest congestion contributor during June.

3. Dynamic Line Rating continues to show significant value

Across monitored assets:

  • Average additional capacity:+13.0%
  • Estimated congestion savings:$88.3 million

Market Context

PJM continues experiencing growing congestion pressure due to:

  • rapid data center demand growth,
  • accelerating electrification,
  • limited transmission expansion,
  • increasing utilization of existing transmission corridors.

Industry reports continue to identify transmission congestion as one of the primary cost drivers in PJM electricity markets. (Wood Mackenzie)

Conclusion

June confirms that transmission congestion remains a persistent economic challenge across PJM, even after May's record-breaking congestion event.

While total congestion costs declined month-over-month, Gridraven continued to identify approximately 13% additional transmission capacity across monitored constraints. This translated into an estimated $88.3 million in potential congestion savings during June, reinforcing that Dynamic Line Rating can deliver consistent value under a range of operating conditions.

As transmission constraints increasingly become the limiting factor for serving growing electricity demand, technologies that safely unlock latent grid capacity can provide immediate operational and economic benefits while longer-term transmission upgrades are developed.